Comments on: ASP.NET MVC XsltViewEngine, patch submitted to the contrib project http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/ thoughts.each { &:propagandise } Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:34:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Ivan Porto Carrero http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-902 Ivan Porto Carrero Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:30:33 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-902 AFAIK .NET has no support for XSLT 2.0 unfortunately AFAIK .NET has no support for XSLT 2.0 unfortunately

]]> By: XSLT 2 http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-901 XSLT 2 Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:08:32 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-901 Hi Ivan I'm evaluating whether the XSLT view engine would be suitable for some work i'm doing. We'd like to use XSLT 2 however. Do you have any tips? Thanks Hi Ivan

I’m evaluating whether the XSLT view engine would be suitable for some work i’m doing. We’d like to use XSLT 2 however. Do you have any tips?

Thanks

]]> By: Jeffrey Palermo http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Jeffrey Palermo Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:11:27 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-127 Thanks for the submission!!! Thanks for the submission!!!

]]> By: Ivan Porto Carrero http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Ivan Porto Carrero Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:43:57 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-126 Igor,<br /><br />I created a new patch today with increased test coverage. As soon as it's in the trunk of MVCContrib I'm sure you can contribute to that open source project.<br /><br />Cheers<br />Ivan Igor,

I created a new patch today with increased test coverage. As soon as it’s in the trunk of MVCContrib I’m sure you can contribute to that open source project.

Cheers
Ivan

]]> By: Igor France http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-125 Igor France Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:01:18 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-125 The link to the patch is dead. Is there another location where this can be reached? I use XSLT a lot with ASP.NET and this is precisely what I would like to see in ASP.NET MVC. Your controller class looks similar to my implementation of MVC I created while working on http://www.tuscanweb.com. In fact, if there is some way I could contribute I'd like to be of assistance. The link to the patch is dead. Is there another location where this can be reached? I use XSLT a lot with ASP.NET and this is precisely what I would like to see in ASP.NET MVC. Your controller class looks similar to my implementation of MVC I created while working on http://www.tuscanweb.com. In fact, if there is some way I could contribute I’d like to be of assistance.

]]> By: Trevor http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Trevor Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:43:11 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-124 As for using XSLT in ASP.NET, not sure why you stopped using it. The XSL support in .NET is very good and I've found it much easier to manipulate XML in general using the .NET libraries. As for getting away from the ugly brackets, funny you should say that. I've found I'm using them a lot more with the MVC model. I almost never used it in straight webforms with code behind, but 3.5 makes things so easy with inline <%foreach(...)%> for example. <br /><br />Just a different set of experiences I suppose.<br /><br /> As for using XSLT in ASP.NET, not sure why you stopped using it. The XSL support in .NET is very good and I’ve found it much easier to manipulate XML in general using the .NET libraries. As for getting away from the ugly brackets, funny you should say that. I’ve found I’m using them a lot more with the MVC model. I almost never used it in straight webforms with code behind, but 3.5 makes things so easy with inline < %foreach(...)%> for example.

Just a different set of experiences I suppose.

]]> By: Max Toro Q. http://flanders.co.nz/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Max Toro Q. Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:43:35 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/12/14/xsltviewengine-patch-submitted/#comment-123 Hi,<br />I'm a big fan of XSLT, I used it in classic ASP but when I moved to .NET lost touch with it.<br /><br />Thanks to the MVC and the separation of concerns there is a chance again to move away from those ugly <% %> blocks.<br /><br />I read some time ago that using code in XSLT had memory leaks issues, do you know about that? I think it is necesary to access Session and Application State, Membership, Roles etc. Hi,
I’m a big fan of XSLT, I used it in classic ASP but when I moved to .NET lost touch with it.

Thanks to the MVC and the separation of concerns there is a chance again to move away from those ugly < % %> blocks.

I read some time ago that using code in XSLT had memory leaks issues, do you know about that? I think it is necesary to access Session and Application State, Membership, Roles etc.

]]>