Comments on: Re: Monorail vs. Rails isn’t a meaningful question http://flanders.co.nz/2007/08/08/re-monorail-vs-rails-isnt-a-meaningful-question/ thoughts.each { &:propagandise } Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:53:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: John Lam http://flanders.co.nz/2007/08/08/re-monorail-vs-rails-isnt-a-meaningful-question/comment-page-1/#comment-94 John Lam Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:59:38 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/08/08/re-monorail-vs-rails-isnt-a-meaningful-question/#comment-94 While we won't have full support for IronRuby in VS anytime soon, I would be interested in seeing how using the .NET Framework from IronRuby works for you. I think that's the sweet spot that IronRuby will ultimately reside. While we won’t have full support for IronRuby in VS anytime soon, I would be interested in seeing how using the .NET Framework from IronRuby works for you. I think that’s the sweet spot that IronRuby will ultimately reside.

]]> By: Philippe Leybaert http://flanders.co.nz/2007/08/08/re-monorail-vs-rails-isnt-a-meaningful-question/comment-page-1/#comment-93 Philippe Leybaert Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:30:01 +0000 http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/08/08/re-monorail-vs-rails-isnt-a-meaningful-question/#comment-93 You made some valid points. <br /><br />While most of us don't like the Microsoft monopoly, I think everyone will agree that the .NET Framework is one of the best development platforms available (ASP.NET is another thing though :-) You made some valid points.

While most of us don’t like the Microsoft monopoly, I think everyone will agree that the .NET Framework is one of the best development platforms available (ASP.NET is another thing though :-)

]]>