<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The language debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flanders.co.nz/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flanders.co.nz/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/</link>
	<description>thoughts.each { &#38;:propagandise }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://flanders.co.nz/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&quot;Every language serves a purpose. Choose the language that serves your purpose best. It may be a different one each time.&quot; - couldn&#039;t agree more!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;The language debate is about one thing - being scared of the dark. Not liking what you can&#039;t see, or what you don&#039;t know&quot; - interesting take.  I agree that I often ignore languages cause I don&#039;t have the bandwidth to grok them but I don&#039;t dish them for that same reason.  Think that in this day in age languages should all-but be irrelevant for more development.  I do understand that in some scenarios the benefits of dynamic languages will outweigh the benefits of a rich IDE etc but it is again horses-for-courses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;C#, Ruby, Javascript, Boo/brail,  a bunch of languages i don&#039;t know yet, xml + xslt&quot; - love this list! in particular the bit about XML(insert XAML)/XSLT being at the END of the list.  I think people that want to work with XAML rather than a designer are just weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Every language serves a purpose. Choose the language that serves your purpose best. It may be a different one each time.&quot; &#8211; couldn&#8217;t agree more!</p>
<p>&quot;The language debate is about one thing &#8211; being scared of the dark. Not liking what you can&#8217;t see, or what you don&#8217;t know&quot; &#8211; interesting take.  I agree that I often ignore languages cause I don&#8217;t have the bandwidth to grok them but I don&#8217;t dish them for that same reason.  Think that in this day in age languages should all-but be irrelevant for more development.  I do understand that in some scenarios the benefits of dynamic languages will outweigh the benefits of a rich IDE etc but it is again horses-for-courses.</p>
<p>&quot;C#, Ruby, Javascript, Boo/brail,  a bunch of languages i don&#8217;t know yet, xml + xslt&quot; &#8211; love this list! in particular the bit about XML(insert XAML)/XSLT being at the END of the list.  I think people that want to work with XAML rather than a designer are just weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://flanders.co.nz/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.koolkraft.net/2007/07/04/the-language-debate/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The language debate is about one thing - being scared of the dark.  Not liking what you can&#039;t see, or what you don&#039;t know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every language serves a purpose.  Choose the language that serves your purpose best.  It may be a different one each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The language debate is about one thing &#8211; being scared of the dark.  Not liking what you can&#8217;t see, or what you don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Every language serves a purpose.  Choose the language that serves your purpose best.  It may be a different one each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

